LogFAQs > #968858252

masterplum posted...

I mean yeah. You can find corner cases for every amendment in the bill of rights where you don't actually want that right to exist but that is the price you pay for having them. You want freedom of speech but that means people can be openly racist or anti-Semitic. You want freedom of religion but that means sometimes people brainwash kids in cults.

I believe in protection against unlawful search and seizure. Of course we would reduce sexual crimes if we installed cameras on every street corner. That's what China does, but I value that freedom even if it means sometimes sexual assaults will occur

Please explain how what is visible through a car window in a public fucking place is "unlawful search and seizure."

You literally just argued "Yep, better let dudes just go to town on themselves OR on an unwilling victim as long as they are in their car, even if it's next to a preschool or in any other public place."

I feel like you had some kind of gut, emotional reaction to this case in particular, and now you're desperate to turn this around on us by making it some kind of privacy/ACAB issue when it isn't even remotely.

This isn't about cameras. It's about something the cop saw happening because IT'S IN. FUCKING. PUBLIC.