LogFAQs > #968795267

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhats up with that new California law? Being able to have sex with minors?
SpiritSephiroth
10/18/22 6:06:52 AM
#4:


Lokison posted...
So now a 20 year old can have sex with an 11 year old?

Shits weird dude. Wtf is going on.

The Reuter article explains it as;

In other words, rather than the young adult being an automatically registered as sex offender, the judge may decide. The most extreme example would be a 24-year-old engaging in non-coercive vaginal sex with a 14-year-old. A more common example, in which it would likely be inappropriate to add a person to the registry, would be a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old having vaginal sex.

But still seems pretty fucking weird. Some judges let the shittiest things pass, so those "extreme examples" could get through in some cases.

Edit: I think over 14 is the youngest an individual can give consent it says. Which is still weird as there can be a 10 year gap between those ages. So technically a 24 year old can have sex with a 14 year old and not be put on the sex offender register. Why would they even need to expand the law like this?

---
https://i.imgur.com/spfW7gv.jpg https://i.imgur.com/EAuZ5LW.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ZzXmr8X.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1