LogFAQs > #968596615

As much as CE's gonna despise me for referencing him and are already bigoted towards my post despite having an interesting point in it... Andrew Tate had a very thoughtful view on it.

Discounting his personality, he, by all intents and purposes and as far as the average standard is concerned (Not individual preferences you illiterate swine: on average), is peak man: genetically blessed, wealthy, confident, successful, etc.
BUT he went on to say that even if he shot a message to a bunch of women, he'd only get a 40-50% response rate. Which you can only imagine how bad it is for the average man in comparison.
You can be a drop-dead hideous, quite overweight woman, but you'll still get 50+ matches a day without even trying. Anyone saying otherwise and that the gap between men and women is much smaller in online dating is trying to sell you something, or they're just stupid.

Personally, I think everyone should put themselves into offline situations to meet people instead. So much gets judged and simultaneously lost in online environments that it skews the chances even more. Offline? You can control the conversation, use inflections, recognize and correct mistakes, and take her home to bed by day's end.