LogFAQs > #968094332

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Makes no sense why Nintendo cancelled Star Fox 2 in 1995
Arcanine2009 09/17/22 2:10:33 AM #21:	it was star fox 2 that used the extra chip Questionmarktarius posted... You can't really sell a $80 SNES game when better PS1 games are $40. I agree that it probably wasn't feasible to release it with the FX chip (if it was proven to be a flop due to the extra cost)... But How do you know they'd sell it for $80? What better games? Can't say software on PS1 is better due to being on stronger hardware. --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:968094332] in Makes no s... [t:80168368]...</cite> <quote>it was star fox 2 that used the extra chipQuestionmarktarius posted... </cite><quote>You can't really sell a $80 SNES game when better PS1 games are $40.</quote>I agree that it probably wasn't feasible to release it with the FX chip (if it was proven to be a flop due to the extra cost)... But How do you know they'd sell it for $80? What better games? Can't say software on PS1 is better due to being on stronger hardware. --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1