LogFAQs > #967310960

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHillary is still going after Sanders...calls him sexist in her new book.
foreverzero212
08/14/22 8:25:03 PM
#110:


VitalGetPrank posted...
For starters, McCain was a way better candidate than Trump. Literally anyone is. More importantly, however, this is a lie by omission, because another 13.7% voted third party or wrote in Harambe, or stayed home altogether.
Another 13.7% weren't Democrats. Hillary-McCain primary voters were very much spiteful Democrats, as evidenced by the PUMA movement. You're never going to get 100% participation so that being your win condition means you're an unelectable candidate.

And that's being charitable with the best numbers you could find. Which still showed less Bernie-Trump voters than Hillary-McCain voters lmao. The Duke University study destroys what tiny sliver of an argument you had left to run behind.

When Bernie won Nevada, MSNBC and others started floating the idea of "sitting this one out so Democrats can get someone they like." As in let Trump win. NYTimes reported that Democrat leadership was willingly to hurt the party and risk losing to Trump in order to stop Bernie. You have literally nothing to support that centrists are less ass-blasted.

---
lions and panthers oh my
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1