LogFAQs > #966964675

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Previously sealed documents seem to imply that Depp might be bad
DeadBankerDream 07/31/22 9:55:30 AM #59:	Guns_of_Verdun posted... I agree although it's worth stating both Depp and Heard wanted it that way and consented to it. Heard assumed public attention would give her support via people like Doom_Art And Depp assumed being out in the open would clear his name in the court of public opinion after the UK trial They were both right. I'd argue the OJ Simpson trial was more egregious . But yeah, people going "Depp might be bad too" and researching his life for "points" like it was a sporting event is super duper fucked up As I remember it Amber Heard did not consent to the trial being televised, but rules stated only one party had to agree for cameras to enter the courtroom. --- "That thick shaft that causes women to shudder!" <cite>DeadBankerDream posted [p:966964675] in Previously... [t:80113049]...</cite> <quote>Guns_of_Verdun posted... </cite> <quote>I agree although it's worth stating both Depp and Heard wanted it that way and consented to it. Heard assumed public attention would give her support via people like Doom_Art And Depp assumed being out in the open would clear his name in the court of public opinion after the UK trial They were both right. I'd argue the OJ Simpson trial was more egregious . But yeah, people going "Depp might be bad too" and researching his life for "points" like it was a sporting event is super duper fucked up</quote>As I remember it Amber Heard did not consent to the trial being televised, but rules stated only one party had to agree for cameras to enter the courtroom. --- "That thick shaft that causes women to shudder!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1