LogFAQs > #966184688

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Texas AG says SCOTUS should strike down Lawrence
realnifty1 06/28/22 6:26:24 PM #53:	Sayoria posted... Loving isn't in any threat. Thomas would stand up for that one for no specific reason. I don't think he would. Dude seems riddled with self-hate over a lot of things and it would be unlikely (this or lgbt marriage rights ) to undo existing marriages being recognized federally, but would open the door for States to rip away a lot of the specific spousal rights as well as preventing new marriages. <cite>realnifty1 posted [p:966184688] in Texas AG s... [t:80074753]...</cite> <quote>Sayoria posted... </cite> <quote>Loving isn't in any threat. Thomas would stand up for that one for no specific reason.</quote>I don't think he would. Dude seems riddled with self-hate over a lot of things and it would be unlikely (this or lgbt marriage rights ) to undo existing marriages being recognized federally, but would open the door for States to rip away a lot of the specific spousal rights as well as preventing new marriages. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1