LogFAQs > #965815611

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Aftermath
BlueCrystalTear 06/14/22 6:28:04 PM #55:	PrivateBiscuit1 posted... He likely expected a settlement with the upcoming pressure of the Amber Heard trial, and he likely expected that settlement to be solidified because he assumed like most people Amber would have won that trial, making it more likely Depp would settled to get that one away. Obviously that didn't happen, and now he's stuck with this upcoming trial that he may still try to get out of before it hits the court room. But if he's banking on getting appearances and such to make up for the ridiculous amount of money he's likely spent so far, it's not going to make up for it. Not only that, he's also likely to pay for attorney's fees after they waste all this time with an obviously fake story. So he's just continually losing money at this point. red sox 777 posted... If his only statements are within his lawsuit, there's no defamation because statements in a lawsuit are protected by litigation privilege. Otherwise, lots of winning parties to a lawsuit would file follow up suits for defamation. All this makes sense. Forgive my ignorance on 1) how legal fees and such work and 2) about defamation. I'd thought that, if your false accusations cause negative press covfefe and you partake in interviews of lies and such, that you could still be sued, but I'm no lawyer so I'm not the person to ask. Thanks. TheRock1525 posted... Unless I'm misreading, everything says that the accuser in Depp's next trial has a lawyer. He isn't representing himself. It would help to have a source on that. --- BlueCrystalTear \| You're living your own life. You're you. #FearTheDeer \| ((FREE HUGS)) <cite>BlueCrystalTear posted [p:965815611] in Johnny Dep... [t:80057353]...</cite> <quote>PrivateBiscuit1 posted... </cite> <quote>He likely expected a settlement with the upcoming pressure of the Amber Heard trial, and he likely expected that settlement to be solidified because he assumed like most people Amber would have won that trial, making it more likely Depp would settled to get that one away. Obviously that didn't happen, and now he's stuck with this upcoming trial that he may still try to get out of before it hits the court room. But if he's banking on getting appearances and such to make up for the ridiculous amount of money he's likely spent so far, it's not going to make up for it. Not only that, he's also likely to pay for attorney's fees after they waste all this time with an obviously fake story. So he's just continually losing money at this point.</quote> red sox 777 posted... </cite> <quote>If his only statements are within his lawsuit, there's no defamation because statements in a lawsuit are protected by litigation privilege. Otherwise, lots of winning parties to a lawsuit would file follow up suits for defamation.</quote>All this makes sense. Forgive my ignorance on 1) how legal fees and such work and 2) about defamation. I'd thought that, if your false accusations cause negative press covfefe and you partake in interviews of lies and such, that you could still be sued, but I'm no lawyer so I'm not the person to ask. Thanks. TheRock1525 posted... </cite> <quote>Unless I'm misreading, everything says that the accuser in Depp's next trial has a lawyer. He isn't representing himself.</quote>It would help to have a source on that. --- BlueCrystalTear \| You're living your own life. You're you. #FearTheDeer \| ((FREE HUGS))</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1