LogFAQs > #965594225

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Small trial saw a 100% success rate in curing rectal cancer
COVxy 06/06/22 4:21:32 PM #4:	DepreceV2 posted... The sample size is so small though that its really insignificant but it might be something to keep your eye on. Eh, if 18 patients all saw improvement, there's very little doubt that it works. The biggest worries here because of sample size are: inability to estimate prevalance of side-effects that are even a little rare, and biased sampling, meaning it might only work well in the subset of patients they let into this selective trial. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:965594225] in Small tria... [t:80047434]...</cite> <quote>DepreceV2 posted... </cite> <quote>The sample size is so small though that its really insignificant but it might be something to keep your eye on.</quote> Eh, if 18 patients all saw improvement, there's very little doubt that it works. The biggest worries here because of sample size are: inability to estimate prevalance of side-effects that are even a little rare, and biased sampling, meaning it might only work well in the subset of patients they let into this selective trial. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1