LogFAQs > #965436856

One analyst on the channel I'm listening to said she knows Amber's lying because she's talking in present tense as if making up the story on the spot, while Kate Moss testified using past tense as if recollecting something that had happened to her. That... was a VERY insightful comment. I didn't notice, but it makes sense now. That's why Amber can't sell it: She's clearly storytelling, making things up on the spot. I mean, I do that when I'm recounting, but it's authentic.

Rottenborn lying about the message being sent is ridiculous and that's why he's such a slimeball. If the jury DOES side with Amber, they're setting a bad precedent for victims of abuse. Almost everything Rottenborn said was by proxy of Amber, in all her wrongfulness. Everything he said was in reverse.

Shocked at no verdict today. Probably tomorrow. They have a lot of things to go through but I hope they stand with justice and give Amber her due recompense. It's time she pay for all her lies, for all her abuse, for all her hypocrisy.