LogFAQs > #964934735

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Explain the keystone pipeline to me
ellis123 05/10/22 4:19:22 PM #14:	Mizznox posted... This, and it was basically just going to be a shortcut for already-existing lines. Increasing capacity, yes, but not like it was opening up a whole new avenue. That isn't true at all. The current pipeline isn't equipped to handle the oilsand at all and would require massive amounts of renovation if they didn't want it to immediately eat through the lines. The reason it's more direct is because the material is hazardous and Canada doesn't want it in their land as much as possible + it is cheaper to do a direct path regardless of how much farmland it goes through. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:964934735] in Explain th... [t:80016110]...</cite> <quote>Mizznox posted... </cite> <quote>This, and it was basically just going to be a shortcut for already-existing lines. Increasing capacity, yes, but not like it was opening up a whole new avenue.</quote>That isn't true at all. The current pipeline isn't equipped to handle the oilsand at all and would require massive amounts of renovation if they didn't want it to immediately eat through the lines. The reason it's more direct is because the material is hazardous and Canada doesn't want it in their land as much as possible + it is cheaper to do a direct path regardless of how much farmland it goes through. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1