LogFAQs > #964819887

Ruvan22 posted...

Okay, from your grammar I wasn't which way you were drawing the comparison.

You didn't or avoided my other question - what did you mean by "Now you have to enforce controversial decisions via the hard work of consensus building!"?

Abortion is an issue where people have strong conviction, and one that clearly, from historical precedent, was not considered a right protected by the constitution judging from the fact that different states regulated abortion in different times at the right of the founding. This is the sort of thing, that by intent, people are supposed to argue and disagree with on and come up with policy compromises at the state level. Roe v Wade invalidated all that and was in effect an effort in social engineering and taking sides which has caused more strife and extremism than any decision in living memory. Bringing it back to the states should force some level of compromise.