LogFAQs > #963603334

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicA fact many refuse to accept as true:
nfearurspecimn
03/20/22 8:50:35 AM
#27:


BalanceLost posted...
A person who guaranteed has no STDs/STIs is of course the safety sex partner of all, but that doesnt change my statement that an HIV-positive person on successful treatment is one of the safest sex partners. Because if we look at this from a real world perspective, which is what safe sex needs to be based on, the risk is higher if you have sex with a person who regularly OR just sometimes have new sexual partners and think they are negative because a test they took last week said so but they took the test less than 3 months after their last sexual encounter. Because it could be a false negative since enough time hasnt gone by for the test to detect HIV, but the person could be infectious by the time you sleep with them. A person could have only had sex once some time ago, and gotten infected without knowing and they took a test too soon or not at all, and then they infect their second partner since both think all is well and there is no need for a condom.
I mean that's true but also a person could lie about taking the meds...

---
Wake up. You have to wake up. *currently a preta/hungry ghost*
Dai Grepher: I was wrong. My entire theory is incorrect. Zero Mission IS a remake of Metroid.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1