LogFAQs > #886049136

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which "Game of Thrones" leader would make the best POTUS?
Lorenzo_2003 09/05/17 4:33:56 AM #56:	OEIO999 posted... Ned would continue to give out 'BAD DEALS', cause he knows as much about politics as a pigeon knows about jerking off. Stannis would be a more menacing version of Trump, enforcing a theocratic ruling body as well. Also he doesn't want to rule, he wants it because 'it's his right'. Which is never the path to democracy. Of the three, Tywin is the only right answer. Yeah, I vote Tywin. He was a badass who understood all the politics of Westeros, but was still willing to lead his troops on the battlefield. He exemplifies the no excuses, just get it done type of leader who could improve his kingdom and protect his allies. People voting Ned... Lol. He would have been a good general in the modern military, but no way would he have done well as the overall leader. He never wanted to rule, anyway. He was also too stupid, proud and naive to keep things from falling apart. Don't get me wrong, Ned was the kind of guy I'd want fighting by my side. --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:886049136] in Which &quo... [t:75736189]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> Ned would continue to give out 'BAD DEALS', cause he knows as much about politics as a pigeon knows about jerking off. Stannis would be a more menacing version of Trump, enforcing a theocratic ruling body as well. Also he doesn't want to rule, he wants it because 'it's his right'. Which is never the path to democracy. Of the three, Tywin is the only right answer.</quote> Yeah, I vote Tywin. He was a badass who understood all the politics of Westeros, but was still willing to lead his troops on the battlefield. He exemplifies the no excuses, just get it done type of leader who could improve his kingdom and protect his allies. People voting Ned... Lol. He would have been a good general in the modern military, but no way would he have done well as the overall leader. He never wanted to rule, anyway. He was also too stupid, proud and naive to keep things from falling apart. Don't get me wrong, Ned was the kind of guy I'd want fighting by my side. --- ...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1