LogFAQs > #885735974

Darklit_Minuet posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Darklit_Minuet posted...

darkjedilink posted...

He was a violent moron who assaulted an armed Latino from behind without provocation.

And I never believed in this narrative. He was just a kid going home with skittles and juice, who had to defend himself from a violent lunatic with a gun

Still lying - he didn't defend himself, because he was never attacked.

Prove that Zimmerman wasn't the aggressor then.

Zimmerman followed a kid with a gun, tried to sucker punch him, tripped over his own feet and hit his head on the sidewalk, then shot him. This explains how he got the minor head wounds and why Martin had no defensive injuries

If you trip on your feet after throwing a punch and do not catch yourself with your already outstretched arm, the head wound will always be on the forehead, not the back of the head unless he had cat-like reflexes to spin himself around 180 degrees while falling and then threw a DawkinsNumber4 fit right after hitting the ground (not plausible).

Also, Trayvon's autopsy showed that he had scraped knuckles indicating that he actually threw several punches at Zimmerman that made contact but no other wounds other than the gunshot. Zimmerman had no injuries showing that he was ever on the offense but rather those showing that he was on the receiving end of a beatdown including lacerations to the back of the head, black eyes, and a nose injury.

But don't let your victim-complex narrative ever get in the way of hard facts. It's far more entertaining to watch people try to argue against the physical evidence so rational people can laugh at you.
---

Hmm...