I mean not even all the shit they listed could be considered hate crimes and the general "summary" for a good number of them scream bias, not to mention the site was founded as a reaction to the fake stories regarding Trump around the election and it's aftermath, so it's a bit dishonest to claim it ISN'T biased.
Not that everything they link is wrong, because that's clearly not the case, but when you have things like:
The author claims that he "knows" the president is ignoring a suspected hate crime at a Minnesota mosque because "the administration is more than willing to sacrifice different segments of the American public to keep itself in power". - That's not discrediting a hate crime, it's attacking an author of an article claiming there is a hate crime being ignored
And there's dozens of ones like that
I remember that site being around before Trump's election.
Yes, I just read the summaries and there does appear to be bias, but most of the cases are legit. Most involve alleged hate crimes and most are linked to credible sources (including the case here). Dismissing as "bullshit" like the other poster did is pathetic.