LogFAQs > #885532435

Error1355 posted...

Nenjii posted...

Not in rules. Still waiting for you to provide factual basis on your TOS. Show me.

I mean the hard-ass answer to that is the first bullet point of the ToU but we try to avoid just outright saying 'we can delete any post that the site deems not appropriate', but I'm at least explaining to you the logic of why this is viewed as an illegal activities rule violation. You were explained this multiple times in your dispute as well. Sorry you are upset with the rule but the deletion was appropriate.

Too bad you did not link that rule when you modded me, but accused me of breaking an EULA that was never done. So now you have to move the goalpost away from the topic because you can provide no rule that I supposedly broke, and have to go to your "last resort" argument that you can do whatever you want, for no reason.

I am glad you finally proved my point that you can be modded for something that isn't against the rules, and finally admit that you agree with me. As I stated before, I understand you have certain rules in place to protect your website.

But you provided no logic as to how I broke a rule, and imply hearsay over and over, only that something I stated can be used, if certain conditions are met. Which are:

1) Someone has to have an intention of doing something I never talked about, which is to exploit the cloud agreement.

2) They have to have the knowledge of how to do so, again, which I never spoke of.

3) They have to edit the save. <<< Which again is not against your TOS, and you have linked me no factual basis for why "you do not allow" something that is not against the rules.

4) That person would have to have a cloud PS+ licence, which again, I never mentioned. And the person would have to upload it to the cloud after accepting this.

5) You are implying I am guilty of someone elses evil intentions, even though I mention nothing how to do it. In US law you cannot commit a crime by talking about something that is not a crime.

You must show correlation, causation, and intent. Again you are implying intent from me for something I never mentioned, and accusing me of breaking a rule that doesn't exist and you can provide no proof in your TOS, and are also accusing me of causing someone else to break a rule and placing me at fault for something I never mentioned. I am not everyones babysitter, and the responsibility of someone elses actions are not on me, especially since I never mentioned how to even do as you state.

It's clear you have nothing to go on. Or you would have ended this quickly with a direct TOU link shutting me down. But you did not do such, you simply state hearsay about rules that do not exist. Because a mod says so, it is such, even though it is not in the rules. Goodbye. This is just laughable now.
---

My top 5 favorite games: 1) Tactics Ogre PSP remake 2) Tactics Ogre (original) 3) Xenogears 4) Shadowrun Sega Genesis 5) FF12 IZJS