it draws it's conclusions not from any people, but from other studies? and then, as far as I can see, not even cite which ones?
we already know one such researcher manipulated his data to sell his beliefs, and his name is all over the references. So, yeah, I'm not at all convinced this isn't misleading as well.
*shrugs* I was fine finding a different source because you didn't like the bias that the first host had, but if you're not going to accept studies from the NCBI (a well-respected branch of the NIH) either then no study is going to satisfy you. Feel free to believe whatever you want, just don't try claiming it's based on any science.
1) you lost all credibility when you tried to pass that first steaming pile off as science. 2) NCBI never ever, not even once, posts things from biased sources? or things that other NBCI studies disagree with?
you found a source that told you what you wanted to hear. don't blame me when you ignore all the others that disagree with it, whether you go looking for them or not.
He found THREE sources, and showed the actual data.
Kids aren't trans. Fucking deal with it. ---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen