LogFAQs > #885229552

3rd_Best_Master posted...

gamepimp12 posted...

I never said they had to be in contention, a lot of the damage they do in meetings is purely unintentional.

My point is in meetings about shared experiences someone who doesn't share in the experience just distracts from the topic.

All it takes is something as simply as a reference they don't understand and the topic was derailed

Seems like it would be more fruitful to explain to them what they're doing wrong unintentionally instead of just excluding them entirely. That way they'll understand you better and it'll help lead to a more productive dialogue. Try bridging that gap in understanding instead of demanding that white people should just do as they're told and to shut up.

That's for separate meetings, if I'm having a meeting about shared experiences do you want to spend it explaining it to outsiders.

You have that open dialogue another time, and more frequently than you have the minority only meeting
---

we rich now but used to be slaves,we pushing whips now we used to be whipped,rockin chains when we used to be in 'em