LogFAQs > #885101528

My point is that people are making call-backs to WWII to justify arguments today and have no idea what they're talking about. It's creating a shit-storm of ignorance. Many counter-protesters (or allies) are using WWII as part of the rhetoric against the neo-Nazis, when the facts I have presented invalidated this. The antifa camp thinking the generation that voted 53% in favour of Jews having their rights restricted and embraced strong anti-socialist sentiments wanting anything to do with a group of people who don't believe in the first amendment and do believe in bending over backwards on SJW crusades with things like "white privilege checklists" is ludicrous. That doesn't mean the vets would support the neo-Nazis, by any means. I highly doubt they would. But it's clear as day that antifa in its present state would be considered very subversive to anyone even a few decades ago. They're basically taking the names of the WWII soldiers in vain because their more radical policies don't hold any water. Ever. Those veterans would today be targeted and protested by antifa for the commonly held beliefs of that time, yet they're using their glory to further their agenda. It's insulting in more than one way.

On the other side, you have a freakshow Hitler openly found repugnant trying to fight some odd "campaign of history's losers" to restore their dead ideologies to glory. It swings both ways, and everyone involved is stupid.
---

"message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888