LogFAQs > #885081771

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It really isn't funny anymore - Trump is nowhere near fit to be President
GOD-KING 08/19/17 7:56:35 PM #37:	Bullet_Wing posted... GOD-KING posted... my problem with johnson was that he didnt seem to take the principles of libertarianism seriously i dont know if he was just unaware or was trying to win over the democrats' votes. I'd be willing to bet that was the case GOD-KING posted... I wouldnt mind him over trump but to be honest i feel like he wouldve caved into pressure from the establishment far too easily Empty platitudes aside, what has Trump done that makes people see him as antiestablishment? I see that label thrown on him, but zero backing it up. His arms deal with Saudi Arabia and willingness to flood positions with Goldman Sachs lobbyists speak volumes otherwise. He talks a great talk, but walks like Stephen Hawking I agree Trump isnt coming through on a lot of what he said That being the case, at least he said he would in his campaign, unlike Johnson who for whatever reason started going haywire from a libertarian perspective, and he does seem to be resisting. He seems to at least be putting up a good fight against the idea of globalism. when he got us out of the paris accord that was an act of preserving american sovereignty He tried to fight Obamacare but couldnt get it done. That probably shook his resolve and he probably wont make any big moves until he feels like he can get a "W" under his belt. He also seemed to back off the central bank, unfortunately, but he was probably shaken down by the deep state Like I said if I had things my way Johnson wouldve won (or Ron paul wouldve won years ago) It's important to understand just exactly what the government has become and how deep rooted all the corruption runs. the President is only one man in the face of global interests and the deep state <cite>GOD-KING posted [p:885081771] in It really ... [t:75687928]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GOD-KING posted...</cite> <quote>my problem with johnson was that he didnt seem to take the principles of libertarianism seriously i dont know if he was just unaware or was trying to win over the democrats' votes. </quote> I'd be willing to bet that was the case <cite>GOD-KING posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt mind him over trump but to be honest i feel like he wouldve caved into pressure from the establishment far too easily</quote> Empty platitudes aside, what has Trump done that makes people see him as antiestablishment? I see that label thrown on him, but zero backing it up. His arms deal with Saudi Arabia and willingness to flood positions with Goldman Sachs lobbyists speak volumes otherwise. He talks a great talk, but walks like Stephen Hawking</quote> I agree Trump isnt coming through on a lot of what he said That being the case, at least he said he would in his campaign, unlike Johnson who for whatever reason started going haywire from a libertarian perspective, and he does seem to be resisting. He seems to at least be putting up a good fight against the idea of globalism. when he got us out of the paris accord that was an act of preserving american sovereignty He tried to fight Obamacare but couldnt get it done. That probably shook his resolve and he probably wont make any big moves until he feels like he can get a "W" under his belt. He also seemed to back off the central bank, unfortunately, but he was probably shaken down by the deep state Like I said if I had things my way Johnson wouldve won (or Ron paul wouldve won years ago) It's important to understand just exactly what the government has become and how deep rooted all the corruption runs. the President is only one man in the face of global interests and the deep state</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1