LogFAQs > #884964793

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 127: Jay Cullen and Berke Bates
SupremeZero 08/17/17 6:08:22 PM #88:	Corrik posted... SupremeZero posted... Corrik posted... StealThisSheen posted... Corrik posted... Like, the prosecutor doesn't just add charges that have no bearing to a case just because. You have to have reliable thought of having violated said law to charge it. This is 150% false. Absolutely. They aim for the highest crime and as many crimes as they possibly can, even if they know it won't fly in court, so that if they do choose to plea, they can start higher. Or if it gets knocked down by the judge, etc. Aim for the highest crime they think is provable. They do not add crimes for giggles. Watch less TV. My brother is in law school right now, just finishing his second internship, and my father wrote at least one of his textbooks. The idea that the logic comes from watching TV is hilarious. You clearly don't seem to know the nuances of the law. It was a crime. They made their "statement" I guess. And, the consequences will be met. People thinking they are above the law and some sort of moral reasoning will make the law go away to support their messages are the ones mistaken. So explain why everyone who has actually been cited that has law professions thinks they're good to go, including the defense attorney's twitter feed that started this conversation, and your word is "I think this person I know will probably disagree", but you don't appear to have actually ASKED them. --- There's always hope for better things in life. But you can't let anything, friend, lover,God himself,be your hope. You have to be your own hope <cite>SupremeZero posted [p:884964793] in Politics C... [t:75680353]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SupremeZero posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>StealThisSheen posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Like, the prosecutor doesn't just add charges that have no bearing to a case just because. You have to have reliable thought of having violated said law to charge it.</quote> This is 150% false. Absolutely. They aim for the highest crime and as many crimes as they possibly can, even if they know it won't fly in court, so that if they do choose to plea, they can start higher. Or if it gets knocked down by the judge, etc.</quote> Aim for the highest crime they think is provable. They do not add crimes for giggles. Watch less TV.</quote> My brother is in law school right now, just finishing his second internship, and my father wrote at least one of his textbooks. The idea that the logic comes from watching TV is hilarious.</quote> You clearly don't seem to know the nuances of the law. It was a crime. They made their "statement" I guess. And, the consequences will be met. People thinking they are above the law and some sort of moral reasoning will make the law go away to support their messages are the ones mistaken.</quote> So explain why everyone who has actually been cited that has law professions thinks they're good to go, including the defense attorney's twitter feed that started this conversation, and your word is "I think this person I know will probably disagree", but you don't appear to have actually ASKED them. --- There's always hope for better things in life. But you can't let anything, friend, lover,God himself,be your hope. You have to be your own hope</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1