LogFAQs > #884399499

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hellbalde (PS4, PC) sitting at 81 on metacritic
snesmaster40 08/08/17 11:32:24 AM #16:	Giant_Aspirin posted... snesmaster40 posted... Alucard188 posted... Jim Sterling pulled his review because he gave it a one out of ten in a pique of frustration because he ran into a game breaking glitch. Basically, the game auto-saves behind you as you go. He missed lighting a torch that allowed him to progress further, and the game autosaved behind him, basically prohibiting him from progressing further. It was disappointing because he was actually really liking the game, and would have given it at seven or eight out of 10, but he couldn't give it that good of a score when he ran into a game breaking problem. Still, the rest of the game sounds pretty good. For anyone wondering, he gave it a 1/10 as a final score despite not finishing the game. What a joke reviewer. when the game literally breaks in a way that prevents you from finishing, what other score is justified? a game-breaking bug like that, and one so obvious, should never have made past basic testing. A temporary score, instead of a final score? He doesn't even need the clicks or attention as his site and Youtube stuff doesn't collect advertising revenue. As I've also said, he's the only reviewer that had this glitch. IGN also did something similar with Prey, because they had a bug that no-one else had. --- Kizuna Ai plays Quick, Draw! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7n_qaQJUA <cite>snesmaster40 posted [p:884399499] in Hellbalde ... [t:75649818]...</cite> <quote><cite>Giant_Aspirin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snesmaster40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>Jim Sterling pulled his review because he gave it a one out of ten in a pique of frustration because he ran into a game breaking glitch. Basically, the game auto-saves behind you as you go. He missed lighting a torch that allowed him to progress further, and the game autosaved behind him, basically prohibiting him from progressing further. It was disappointing because he was actually really liking the game, and would have given it at seven or eight out of 10, but he couldn't give it that good of a score when he ran into a game breaking problem. Still, the rest of the game sounds pretty good.</quote> For anyone wondering, he gave it a 1/10 as a final score despite not finishing the game. What a joke reviewer.</quote> when the game literally breaks in a way that prevents you from finishing, what other score is justified? a game-breaking bug like that, and one so obvious, should never have made past basic testing.</quote> A temporary score, instead of a final score? He doesn't even need the clicks or attention as his site and Youtube stuff doesn't collect advertising revenue. As I've also said, he's the only reviewer that had this glitch. IGN also did something similar with Prey, because they had a bug that no-one else had. --- Kizuna Ai plays Quick, Draw! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7n_qaQJUA</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1