LogFAQs > #884358837

KanzarisKelshen posted...

Which does not imply causation. Every kind of animal establishes its own society, same as humanity. This doesn't make their decisions biologically rooted.

so you're going to ignore a consistent, observable pattern of behavior that's massively widespread instead?



KanzarisKelshen posted...

A) Western social biases say women are subservient, at the moment.

...no. it does not.

KanzarisKelshen posted...

B) Parity increasing with limitations on success is demonstrably false. Source: Free market in action.

...dude, it's the free market that's proven it.
countries with bigger markets that offer more opportunities result in parity drop. countries with smaller markets or those that offer fewer opportunities result in parity increasing.

it's straight up an inverse relationship. you have more choice, you go into the fields you like. most women prefer certain fields, most men prefer certain different fields, that's... basically it. when choice is available everyone goes into what they prefer, that's how it works in everything, not just employment. take entertainment - some movies work more towards women, others work more towards men. same thing with video games. same thing with music. same thing with books.

but parity was far, far lower when we had fewer choices. when there was little choice, more people would see/play/read/listen to the same things, just as when there's fewer choices to have a comfortable life more people will be in the same field. as it got bigger/as job opportunities grew bigger, people get to pick what they want and "parity" fades away in favor of "happiness" and "free will." this is shown everywhere. free market does not favor parity.

KanzarisKelshen posted...

You should question things more thoroughly.

throwing this one back at you because your insistence of parity undermines both free will and happiness, yet you aren't questioning that at all.
---

"Maybe it's a tentacle, molesting the planet itself. - Aschen Brodel.