LogFAQs > #883952780

Dash_Harber posted...

Volkswagen_Bros posted...

Now saying "There isn't sufficient proof of God's existence" makes more sense because the Universe, as massive and expanding as it is, isn't and probably might never be 100% explored.

That's not really fair, though. All claims that exist without any evidence are not, "lacking sufficient evidence". If I claim something insane, like that the ancient pyramids were built by time traveling New Yorker's who had been enslaved by inter-dimensional lizard people, you would say "there is no evidence of that" because the claim lacks evidence.

As for Christianity, it inherently can't have any proof. The concepts of faith and proof are mutually exclusive. You can either have one or the other. Faith, by definition, means believing in something without faith. So there actually is 'no evidence of God'.

That being said, I agree that calling a god, "a magic sky man" is asinine and hurts his cause more than it helps it.

Evidence, can be footprints, while in Gods case it would be the universe itself. Or experience itself. Talking about our experience doesn't mention anything about the experience we have. In my experience though, there's intuitive feelings brought about by experiencing experience and that essence itself scales meaning when adjusting the scope of all things.

It goes without saying common sense is not common. God can be sensed, and senses can be lost. But without a sense of doubt the multititude of God has presented presence in my senses enough times to know better than those who are senseless, or out of touch with God.

Relationships define our existence, and the quality of all our relationships determine the presentation of our presence and set the limits of our senses. When something has not been used for so long, it is forgotten. When one has not, nor proof beyond recollection. It cannot be reconciled without the condusive presence from the seeker of the lost senses, nor proven beyond the senses.

If you do write proof of God, and remove freewill from another by writing determination of the absolute truth, watch as it dissolves before it is shared. Such proof would destroy itself seemlessly in logical accord to our physical science, to restore freewill. The laws of nature are the laws of God.
---

~Reward your curiosity~