LogFAQs > #883728100

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump says transgenders aren't allowed in the military, ok?
_AdjI_ 07/27/17 10:10:36 PM #92:	The_Beta_Male posted... oh my bad, you just have this really unique way of typing that disguises the point behind unnecessary attempts to appear intelligent adjl posted... $5 says Shenti won't actually be able to articulate a valid reason for saying this. I mean, that doesn't seem very disguised to me, but... shrug. You do you, my friend. The_Beta_Male posted... All right, why I think the ban is a good idea? Because I'm not a fan of those people. Okay? That's not a reason to consider it a good idea. That just means you like it. That's a very important distinction that you really should learn to make if you wish to function in civilized society. The_Beta_Male posted... But if I had to give a proper reason, it's because all the hormone therapy, medication and other bulls* has NO fING PLACE IN AN ARMY FIGHTING IN A WAR. I cannot fing believe this is a debate; there's literally no argument. They are not fit for battle with all that s* and it could potentially become a huge distraction and annoyance for the regular soldiers. Plenty of other soldiers are on medication, though. Plenty of other soldiers are receiving treatment for psychological disorders, too. The military already has physical and mental health standards in place to ensure soldiers are fit for duty, which completely covers those concerns. For that purpose, this ban is entirely redundant. Would you like another shot at coming up with a valid reason, or is that the best you can muster? <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:883728100] in Trump says... [t:75606426]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Beta_Male posted...</cite> <quote>oh my bad, you just have this really unique way of typing that disguises the point behind unnecessary attempts to appear intelligent</quote> <cite>adjl posted...</cite> <quote>$5 says Shenti won't actually be able to articulate a valid reason for saying this.</quote> I mean, that doesn't seem very disguised to me, but... shrug. You do you, my friend. <cite>The_Beta_Male posted...</cite> <quote>All right, why I think the ban is a good idea? Because I'm not a fan of those people. Okay?</quote> That's not a reason to consider it a good idea. That just means you like it. That's a very important distinction that you really should learn to make if you wish to function in civilized society. <cite>The_Beta_Male posted...</cite> <quote>But if I had to give a proper reason, it's because all the hormone therapy, medication and other bulls* has NO fING PLACE IN AN ARMY FIGHTING IN A WAR. I cannot fing believe this is a debate; there's literally no argument. They are not fit for battle with all that s* and it could potentially become a huge distraction and annoyance for the regular soldiers.</quote> Plenty of other soldiers are on medication, though. Plenty of other soldiers are receiving treatment for psychological disorders, too. The military already has physical and mental health standards in place to ensure soldiers are fit for duty, which completely covers those concerns. For that purpose, this ban is entirely redundant. Would you like another shot at coming up with a valid reason, or is that the best you can muster?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1