LogFAQs > #883688647

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDon't you people ever see both sides?
emblem boy
07/27/17 10:16:03 AM
#25:


MARKINGRAM22 posted...
emblem boy posted...
MARKINGRAM22 posted...
Sativa_Rose posted...
MARKINGRAM22 posted...
Sativa_Rose posted...
It's the military's fault if they let people "go reserves" if that is actually a bad thing.


Well there is a purpose for reserves, they can't get rid of it.


Then the military isn't suffering. If the military had a problem with too many active duty people trying to go to the reserves, they could just shut that option down.


Many people go straight to reserves and there has to be reserves. People use it a lot to go to school and will go on orders again after and they need it in case something happens and they need to call up more personal, this way they will have people operational that can be called upon.

I don't think he's saying disband the reserves. He's saying remove the option to get a surgery then afterwards join the reserves


So just block off trans people from joining the reserves? I don't see how you could block off anyone from specifically the reserves. The issue would persist if someone joined the reserves transitioned and then wasn't operational.


No, block off anyone from getting a surgery then immediately joining the reserves. Youv said that's what the issue is right,
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.2.1
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1