LogFAQs > #883179427

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The universe came from nothing.
ChromaticAngel 07/18/17 11:13:13 PM #35:	SageHarpuia posted... lukabrosci posted... Tanoomba posted... However, it gives us just enough to understand that something set this all in motion: either nothing or something. What other third factor could there be? "We don't know" isn't a factor, because it's recognition that something pre-existed. Even if it's nothing. why do you assume to not be in motion is the universes natural state? Because it adheres to the Laws of Motion. no object is in motion relative to itself. as we are part of the universe, we can only perceive a nonmoving universe. we would have to exit the universe and observe it from outside of its own boundaries to see if it's moving or not. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:883179427] in The univer... [t:75580640]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lukabrosci posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tanoomba posted...</cite> <quote>However, it gives us just enough to understand that something set this all in motion: either nothing or something. What other third factor could there be? "We don't know" isn't a factor, because it's recognition that something pre-existed. Even if it's nothing. </quote> why do you assume to not be in motion is the universes natural state?</quote> Because it adheres to the Laws of Motion.</quote> no object is in motion relative to itself. as we are part of the universe, we can only perceive a nonmoving universe. we would have to exit the universe and observe it from outside of its own boundaries to see if it's moving or not. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1