LogFAQs > #882449960

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What's your favourite Grand Theft Auto game?
darkknight109 07/06/17 5:48:11 PM #25:	Krazy_Kirby posted... darkknight109 posted... Vice City > 5 >> 4 > San Andreas > 3 Never played 1 or 2. Vice City was the last game in the series that seemed to truly understand the main appeal of the game - stealing things, causing mayhem, and getting into shootouts - that didn't bog it down with ridiculous mechanics (like San Andreas's million-and-one stat bars) or get distracted with terrible minigames no one was interested in (dating in GTA4, the stock market in GTA5, etc). stocks in 5 gave you enough money to buy property and crazy weapons/vehicles Uh huh. And you could buy property and crazy weapons/vehicles in Vice City without needing to go to the stock market first. Which kind of proves my point. Final Fantasy2389 posted... darkknight109 posted... Vice City > 5 >> 4 > San Andreas > 3 While I'm salty you have 3 last, it is your opinion, but putting GTAIV anywhere but last is factually wrong. 3 always felt like a diamond in the rough to me. It was a decent base, but every subsequent game expanded upon it and did it better. I played 3 after VC and SA and it felt very dated even then. 4 was... I don't know, there? I agree with Far-Queue in that I might swap it with SA depending on my mood. SA had more problems, but also more genuinely good aspects. 4 felt like it was a very rote GTA game, with a few problems of its own. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:882449960] in What's you... [t:75537322]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Vice City > 5 >> 4 > San Andreas > 3 Never played 1 or 2. Vice City was the last game in the series that seemed to truly understand the main appeal of the game - stealing things, causing mayhem, and getting into shootouts - that didn't bog it down with ridiculous mechanics (like San Andreas's million-and-one stat bars) or get distracted with terrible minigames no one was interested in (dating in GTA4, the stock market in GTA5, etc).</quote> stocks in 5 gave you enough money to buy property and crazy weapons/vehicles</quote> Uh huh. And you could buy property and crazy weapons/vehicles in Vice City without needing to go to the stock market first. Which kind of proves my point. <cite>Final Fantasy2389 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Vice City > 5 >> 4 > San Andreas > 3 </quote> While I'm salty you have 3 last, it is your opinion, but putting GTAIV anywhere but last is factually wrong.</quote> 3 always felt like a diamond in the rough to me. It was a decent base, but every subsequent game expanded upon it and did it better. I played 3 after VC and SA and it felt very dated even then. 4 was... I don't know, there? I agree with Far-Queue in that I might swap it with SA depending on my mood. SA had more problems, but also more genuinely good aspects. 4 felt like it was a very rote GTA game, with a few problems of its own. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1