LogFAQs > #881792658

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 106: Miner Threat
Corrik
06/25/17 4:51:21 PM
#55:


Jakyl25 posted...
Corrik posted...
Jakyl25 posted...
Corrik posted...
I support the kid thing but not entirely the way it is set up now. I support a kid can stay on parents insurance til 26 only as long as continually enrolled in a higher education system. Otherwise it should be 21 - as long as unemployed.


Why necessitate that criteria? Especially with the continuing diminishment of higher education as viable.

Because you should be able to get a job and get your own health care if you are not in higher education.


But the whole point is that people should be able to get health care even if they can't afford it.

Like, what is the DRAWBACK of leaving people on the family plan until 26 if they're unemployed?

Cuz u could get a job and get it for yourself. It is a handout that is unnecessary.

People who do work should not forced to pay higher rates on plans because people do not want to just get a job and support themselves without any considerable reason for it.
---
LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1