I love how the only arguments that these guys have are basically all ad hominems at this point lol
You mean legitimate and relevant points?
If they were legitimate and relevant, they wouldn't have been so easily debunked
Your biggest arguments were the sharia law in the U.K. (Which I proved didn't exist), the no go zones in Sweden (again, easily proven false) and the Idaho rape case (which never happened)
Here's a fun hypothetical question: pretend you have a 17 year old daughter. She has to go on a foreign exchange trip to get enough credits to be accepted into the only college she wants to go to. The only place left on the list is a house in sweden (a country that does have verifiable statistics that place it as damn near the rape capital of its region in europe) that contains several 18-24 year old migrant muslim men. You can't do a background check on them because they came into the country with the shirts on their backs and have no paperwork or known history. If you send her you're essentially rolling the dice. Do you let her go?