LogFAQs > #880588902

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTransgender MtF sprinter wins 2 girls' state championships
hockeybub89
06/07/17 11:40:06 AM
#85:


Steve Nick posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
Steve Nick posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
Dustin1280 posted...
gunplagirl posted...
Dustin1280 posted...
http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/female-athletes-crushed-by-women-who-were-once-men/

There is more data towards their being a definite problem, then not.

In many of the cases they usually beat the previous record by a HUGE margin.

Examples without science or numbers (ie hormone levels) to validate it does not actually count as data. It still needs to be interpreted by people with regard to hormone levels and the like.

BTW bone density is moot because weight classes, how do they work.

I would rather trust my examples than your "i don't need sources."

Your FEELINGS are not more important then fairness

Sports aren't fair. If you are better, you win more. Michael Phelps was born naturally superior to everyone as a swimmer and largely destroyed everyone in his prime. I also think it is funny people suddenly care about women's sports.



The point of women's sports is to allow a biologically inferior demographic to participate in a fun activity.

If sports weren't segregated by gender, women would never get to play sports.

They are segregated by gender. This sprinter is of the same gender as her fellow competitors.

There are undoubtedly more trans female athletes competing out there than those who are winning state championships. They aren't all winning or even succeeding. I was also unaware the only way to have fun in an individual sport was by winning a state championship or that the majority cis women are somehow barred from competing.


They aren't of the same gender. One is female. One is a transgender female. They're not the same thing.

The reason transgenders aren't winning all of female competitions is simple. There aren't many trans people, so there's likely to be less total number of talented trans athletes. Take for example, a school of 2000 people. 1000 boys, 1000 girls. Let's say 1 in 1000, as a rough guess, is transgender. So, take one RANDOM boy from that school. Is he always going to be better than the most talented female athlete? Of course not. By sheer numbers, it's 1000 against 1. The male, or transgender female, if you prefer, is going to have a tremendous advantage, but still might be an inferior athlete.

There are only two genders and those numbers are my point. There are less trans athletes and only a handful of them are superior athletes.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1