LogFAQs > #879892417

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I don't understand how "pro-choice" even exists
BallerXRosetta- 05/27/17 2:08:07 AM #50:	Sanktu_Vyvorant posted... BallerXRosetta- posted... Sanktu_Vyvorant posted... BallerXRosetta- posted... Nah, they're people. Also: >implying something has to be people in order for its killing to be considered immoral This applies to animals, too. They're actually not people. They're not even considered human by definition "Human. A human being, especially a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien." Also killing =\= murder "Murder. The unlawful killing of another human being without justification or excuse. Murder is perhaps the single most serious criminal offense ." That definition doesn't say anything to why they're not considered people. And what I'm trying to say is that's it's immoral. That's why the killing of animals can also be considered immoral even if it's not technically murder. That definition actually does say as to why they aren't considered people though.... like it says exactly why. And alright, but your opinion on morality is still just that... an opinion. It's not an opinion. It's objectively wrong that the killings of these specific types of sentient beings is wrong. inb4 you don't believe in objective morality. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDmwPGrZkYs I'm not even right wing on a lot of things so you can't use that to distract from the issue at hand. --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/arigreenwood98 http://i.imgtc.com/CeV2MSV.jpg <cite>BallerXRosetta- posted [p:879892417] in I don't un... [t:75391289]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BallerXRosetta- posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BallerXRosetta- posted...</cite> <quote>Nah, they're people. Also: >implying something has to be people in order for its killing to be considered immoral This applies to animals, too.</quote> They're actually not people. They're not even considered human by definition "Human. A human being, especially a person as distinguished from an animal or (in science fiction) an alien." Also killing =\= murder "Murder. The unlawful killing of another human being without justification or excuse. Murder is perhaps the single most serious criminal offense ."</quote> That definition doesn't say anything to why they're not considered people. And what I'm trying to say is that's it's immoral. That's why the killing of animals can also be considered immoral even if it's not technically murder.</quote> That definition actually does say as to why they aren't considered people though.... like it says exactly why. And alright, but your opinion on morality is still just that... an opinion.</quote> It's not an opinion. It's objectively wrong that the killings of these specific types of sentient beings is wrong. inb4 you don't believe in objective morality. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDmwPGrZkYs I'm not even right wing on a lot of things so you can't use that to distract from the issue at hand. --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/arigreenwood98 http://i.imgtc.com/CeV2MSV.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1