LogFAQs > #879892034

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I don't understand how "pro-choice" even exists
BallerXRosetta- 05/27/17 1:56:46 AM #31:	CowboyDan posted... BallerXRosetta- posted... CowboyDan posted... BallerXRosetta- posted... Nah, they're people. Also: >implying something has to be people in order for its killing to be considered immoral This applies to animals, too. I actually respect this perspective a lot. If you're going to be pro-life, then be pro-all-life. I am. That's why I'm vegan but even when "pro-lifers" eat meat, their views on abortions is still correct. Bringing up their other not-so-pro-life views is simply a deflection. Sure, but it's a fair accusation of hypocrisy. That doesn't take anything away from their premise, though. It's like bringing up an instance where an abolitionist once owned slaves and using that as an argument to why slavery should still be allowed. It's a case of flawed messenger but what they're saying is correct. --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/arigreenwood98 http://i.imgtc.com/CeV2MSV.jpg <cite>BallerXRosetta- posted [p:879892034] in I don't un... [t:75391289]...</cite> <quote><cite>CowboyDan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BallerXRosetta- posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CowboyDan posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BallerXRosetta- posted...</cite> <quote> Nah, they're people. Also: >implying something has to be people in order for its killing to be considered immoral This applies to animals, too. </quote> I actually respect this perspective a lot. If you're going to be pro-life, then be pro-all-life.</quote> I am. That's why I'm vegan but even when "pro-lifers" eat meat, their views on abortions is still correct. Bringing up their other not-so-pro-life views is simply a deflection.</quote> Sure, but it's a fair accusation of hypocrisy.</quote> That doesn't take anything away from their premise, though. It's like bringing up an instance where an abolitionist once owned slaves and using that as an argument to why slavery should still be allowed. It's a case of flawed messenger but what they're saying is correct. --- https://supermariomakerbookmark.nintendo.net/profile/arigreenwood98 http://i.imgtc.com/CeV2MSV.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1