LogFAQs > #879712123

UnfairRepresent posted...

Nobody said she was. Why do you have to lie and be intellectually dishonest to attempt to make an argument? All that's being pointed out is the reasoning.

You accept and understand why civilization has a non-negotiation policy, yet at the same time claim you don't understand why submitting to terrorism is a pragmatically bad thing.

It's silly. The reasoning is identical, just coming from different sources.

I never said that submitting to terrorism wasn't bad. Just that maybe people who aren't used to having people die at a performance they were at are going to be, at the very least, a bit shaken up about it enough to the point where they may want to retreat from it all.

Yes, what you're saying is reasonable, but people aren't always reasonable, especially if they've been emotionally compromised by something like a terror attack (whose purpose is to inflict emotional turmoil on the populace). Expecting people to be reasonable 100% of the time isn't exactly reasonable. Also, it may not have been Grande's own choice to even cancel in the first place--I can't see how her agency or something would decide to do it in order to protect her own safety and the safety of her fans. Something most people would actually consider reasonable.
---

spritual powah will never die
Don't be shy to drop a PM to me, I'm always open for conversation.