LogFAQs > #879696427

ASithLord7 posted...

MARKINGRAM22 posted...

I would love you to point out the articles where they properly blame radical Islam without deflecting to another strawman.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2017/05/how_to_stop_groups_like_isis_from_inspiring_terrorist_attacks_like_manchester.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/22/eyewitness_accounts_of_the_manchester_explosions.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/23/manchester_terror_attack_updates.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/23/the_shocking_acts_of_violence_that_have_shaped_manchester_s_history.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/23/could_the_manchester_attack_tilt_britain_s_election.html
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/05/23/in_the_chaos_following_the_bombing_in_manchester_some_people_tweeted_fake.html

I just read the first article. This is completely fair. It was my mistake, but in my defense thought this was a screenshot of a Salon article I read here-

http://www.salon.com/2017/05/23/manchester-was-an-attack-on-girls/

I thought it was this Salon article, which looking at the two side by side I think shows how it is a fair mistake, cause they literally look like they were fed the same exact talking points. It looks like one nearly plagiarized the other. Neither, by some random chance don't mention Islam.
---

"That man practices Islam. Are you happy he was taken out since according to you he believes what terrorists do?" -VipaGTS to me