LogFAQs > #879627598

Zeus posted...

You're neither listening to him nor getting it. Graham was clearly commenting as a layperson. More importantly, you're forgetting that Graham was one of Trump's most vehement opponents and, even after everybody else fell in line, he still insisted he wouldn't vote for Trump.

Where do you pull this bullshit from? You have no reason to come to that sort of conclusion.


Zeus posted...

Nope, his name isn't on there! More importantly, while you claim that he's a Republican, you forget that he's one of Trump's enemies.

Ah yes i forgot who i was talking to. You have to have everything spelled out in exquisite detail and you're incapable of making inferences. He takes part in the congressional hearings in regard to this collusion issue. Whatever the name of the committee that has been holding these hearings is he's on it. At least i presume that its a committee since i don't see all of congress attending them.

Zeus posted...

Says the guy insisting that an unsure SECONDARY source is more definitive than a primary source. The fact remains that not only is Graham NOT in a position to make that statement on behalf of somebody else, he did NOT actually make that statement at all. He gave his opinion and didn't seem certain about that.

As for the issue of intelligence, I fear I greatly overestimated yours.

You greatly overestimate your own intelligence. Just because we didn't talk down to you in baby talk causing shit to go right over your head doesn't make us idiots.

Also, I'd like to point out that his statement has been taken as definitive by the media at this point. Yet, for something you believe to be so clearly wrong and not within Graham's place to be making a statement on we sure haven't had anyone try to correct him in the several days since he made the statement.
---

I love people.
I hate people.