LogFAQs > #879615250

Wanglicious posted...

Inviso posted...

Wang, whether you intend it or not, merely offering up that particular hypothetical is putting those two vastly different things on equal footing,

no, it's really, really not. i mean you may take personal offense to it, but that argument does not do that. as already said, you can run the same argument without any example. therefore the example is used as a choice to deliver a specific counter, it's using something you like and support in the same situation and with the same results as the one you hate. that's all it's doing and all you've been able to do is attack it because you don't like that. look, all you're really said here is that you aren't internally consistent here and that's fine. you're agreeing with the next question posed but you aren't actually addressing it for some reason. it's like you're simply refusing to believe that you can have two completely different positions that contradict each other.

Why don't you explain what you are attempting to explain to me instead of to Inviso, seeing as how you have in multiple instances been hung up on this "personal reasons" thing and can't seem to reconcile that. The "personal offense" does not apply to me although I agree with Inviso completely on this argument.

I mean or just argue from the perspective you would argue from if addressing a person or persons with no personal stake in the matter but still hold the same perspective as Inviso.
---

Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/