LogFAQs > #879403451

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Harvard study proves unprecedented media bias.
Espeon 05/19/17 10:37:12 AM #40:	Vlado posted... Espeon posted... It's amazing how a purported smart person like Vlado is so willing to deny ANY facts that refute his pre-existing world view. Anything that doesn't confirm what he already believes is fake and part of a "globalist conspiracy". Again: https://www.rt.com/op-edge/388842-washington-post-russia-trump/ 5 Washington Post fake news (3 of them negative about Trump) over a very short time period. And that's just one of the many tentacles. Ironically, that very article (decrying WaPo for fake news) ends by saying that the Seth Rich incident is a bombshell that the media is trying to cover up. I'll repeat what I said in the other topic: the reporters that broke the Seth Rich story have retracted it, and the investigator that was the source of the info has claimed he was misquoted. Both sides are claiming "no, I got the info from the other guy." THAT is fake news, yet you keep citing it as fact. The article lists five instances (aside from the power plant hacking) of minor stories that I will admit were bullshit. It presents those articles FIRST to discredit WaPo before continuing with "here's the REAL story they won't talk about". The Seth Rich story is CATEGORICALLY fake news, and yet they bandy it about as fact. So if you don't trust WaPo for spouting fake news, why does RT get a pass? --- Inviso's Most Adorabl-est Eeveelution Ever http://i.imgur.com/SSw6M9E.gif <cite>Espeon posted [p:879403451] in Harvard st... [t:75363139]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Espeon posted...</cite> <quote>It's amazing how a purported smart person like Vlado is so willing to deny ANY facts that refute his pre-existing world view. Anything that doesn't confirm what he already believes is fake and part of a "globalist conspiracy".</quote> Again: https://www.rt.com/op-edge/388842-washington-post-russia-trump/ 5 Washington Post fake news (3 of them negative about Trump) over a very short time period. And that's just one of the many tentacles.</quote> Ironically, that very article (decrying WaPo for fake news) ends by saying that the Seth Rich incident is a bombshell that the media is trying to cover up. I'll repeat what I said in the other topic: the reporters that broke the Seth Rich story have retracted it, and the investigator that was the source of the info has claimed he was misquoted. Both sides are claiming "no, I got the info from the other guy." THAT is fake news, yet you keep citing it as fact. The article lists five instances (aside from the power plant hacking) of minor stories that I will admit were bullshit. It presents those articles FIRST to discredit WaPo before continuing with "here's the REAL story they won't talk about". The Seth Rich story is CATEGORICALLY fake news, and yet they bandy it about as fact. So if you don't trust WaPo for spouting fake news, why does RT get a pass? --- Inviso's Most Adorabl-est Eeveelution Ever http://i.imgur.com/SSw6M9E.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1