LogFAQs > #879401987

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Harvard study proves unprecedented media bias.
Espeon 05/19/17 10:06:20 AM #18:	The important thing to note about that link is the graph towards the bottom. Clinton and Bush Jr. BOTH had majority negative coverage for their first 100 days (and both had similar situations to Trump where they did not carry a majority of the popular vote and thus were more likely to be heavily scrutinized.). Yet neither of them were AS negatively covered as Trump. Isn't it POSSIBLE that, rather than the media being especially unfair to a populist candidate (keeping in mind that Bernie is painted as an outright SAINT), Trump has legitimately done very little in terms of positive content? --- Inviso's Most Adorabl-est Eeveelution Ever http://i.imgur.com/SSw6M9E.gif <cite>Espeon posted [p:879401987] in Harvard st... [t:75363139]...</cite> <quote>The important thing to note about that link is the graph towards the bottom. Clinton and Bush Jr. BOTH had majority negative coverage for their first 100 days (and both had similar situations to Trump where they did not carry a majority of the popular vote and thus were more likely to be heavily scrutinized.). Yet neither of them were AS negatively covered as Trump. Isn't it POSSIBLE that, rather than the media being especially unfair to a populist candidate (keeping in mind that Bernie is painted as an outright SAINT), Trump has legitimately done very little in terms of positive content? --- Inviso's Most Adorabl-est Eeveelution Ever http://i.imgur.com/SSw6M9E.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1