LogFAQs > #879308353

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	NBA Playoffs topic 3: nerf the Warriors
ShatteredElysium 05/17/17 9:53:56 PM #433:	SmartMuffin posted... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_first_overall_NBA_draft_picks The last one of these to deliver a championship to the team who drafted them (without moving around in between) was Tim Duncan. MOST of them never even came particularly close. Tanking for five years to get a shot at one of these guys is the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard of, and the idea that teams would intentionally do it repeatedly is insane. You act like teams don't actively do this when they clearly do. And whilst they may not have outright won a team a championship, there's a decent ratio of all stars and/or MVP's in there compared to other positions. So it is clearly better to draft at #1 than anywhere else <cite>ShatteredElysium posted [p:879308353] in NBA Playof... [t:75319688]...</cite> <quote><cite>SmartMuffin posted...</cite> <quote>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_first_overall_NBA_draft_picks The last one of these to deliver a championship to the team who drafted them (without moving around in between) was Tim Duncan. MOST of them never even came particularly close. Tanking for five years to get a shot at one of these guys is the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard of, and the idea that teams would intentionally do it repeatedly is insane.</quote> You act like teams don't actively do this when they clearly do. And whilst they may not have outright won a team a championship, there's a decent ratio of all stars and/or MVP's in there compared to other positions. So it is clearly better to draft at #1 than anywhere else</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1