LogFAQs > #879121371

foreveraIone posted...

plus its not even going to be real man. nobody will get hurt.

Honestly I hate how arbitrary people get over the aoc stuff. Saying 16 isn't any more or less creepy than saying 18 imo yet a lot of people still flip their shit over the difference.
In terms of just straight up physical looks, not much, if anything is different between 16 and 18. People act like something magical happens on the 18th birthday where a day earlier they were just a kid and not attractive in any way, but magically now they're hot as fuck and adults, nothing is wrong with sexualizing them now. I mean I'm only 19, but fuck there are attractive 16 year olds and I think almost anyone who says otherwise is probably lying. Anything less than that is when you get too sketchy though about even physical attraction though imo
The difference really lies with their psychology and wether or not they're really able to understand the significance of it and truly give consent.
But none of that matters with a virtual girl.

And I got a lot of shit for it before when I defended it before but I don't think that (legally speaking) their should be anything wrong with virtual child porn and stuff like that. Yeah I think it's absolutely disgusting and there should definitely still be the social stigma against it, but just in terms of legality it's a 100% victimless crime and I don't think there should be any punishment for it.
Last time I said that I was called a pedo and child porn apologist, and I'm sure it'll happen again despite the fact that I think it's absolutely disgusting to do something like that or like something like that..I just think if nobody is getting hurt in any way or anything, despite what I may think of it, it should be legal.
---

"You need to lay off the peanut-butthurt and u-jelly sandwiches" - Neon Octopus