LogFAQs > #878262113

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How do you refute the historical evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus
Saloonist 05/01/17 12:36:23 PM #163:	DawkinsNumber4 posted... Saloonist posted... Why shouldn't I believe that Caesar himself survived his execution and fled to India too? Our textual sources for his execution don't come until about a hundred years after his death if I recall correctly. EDIT: Btw Muslims base their belief that Jesus didn't die on the cross on a verse in the Quran which says that only someone with the appearance of Jesus was killed, but that he actually wasn't. The Quran of course comes about 500 years after the Gospels. Do you realize I am not religious so it is all hocus pocus to me and it's your job to try to convince me that your hocus pocus has more credibility than theirs. 1. You linked to the Muslim, whose basis for his belief is 500 years after the fact. Not me. So don't bring in a Muslim explanation, say it's an alternative "theory" and then insult me for destroying the "theory" you posted. 2. My argument for the crucifixion has nothing to do with religion. It is a historical fact well-established compared to any other event in ancient history. This is widely accepted by scholars regardless of denomination, and regardless of whether they are believers or not. You are the only who seems to keep casting doubt on this with baseless speculation, dressed up as "theories" despite all of the evidence provided and no evidence for these "theories" even though I continually ask you to provide some. The burden is on you to either prove a deficit in this evidence or to move on from it. --- BasileosPetros, KhanofKhans, CokeZero, and many more <cite>Saloonist posted [p:878262113] in How do you... [t:75297940]...</cite> <quote><cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Saloonist posted...</cite> <quote> Why shouldn't I believe that Caesar himself survived his execution and fled to India too? Our textual sources for his execution don't come until about a hundred years after his death if I recall correctly. EDIT: Btw Muslims base their belief that Jesus didn't die on the cross on a verse in the Quran which says that only someone with the appearance of Jesus was killed, but that he actually wasn't. The Quran of course comes about 500 years after the Gospels.</quote> Do you realize I am not religious so it is all hocus pocus to me and it's your job to try to convince me that your hocus pocus has more credibility than theirs.</quote> 1. You linked to the Muslim, whose basis for his belief is 500 years after the fact. Not me. So don't bring in a Muslim explanation, say it's an alternative "theory" and then insult me for destroying the "theory" you posted. 2. My argument for the crucifixion has nothing to do with religion. It is a historical fact well-established compared to any other event in ancient history. This is widely accepted by scholars regardless of denomination, and regardless of whether they are believers or not. You are the only who seems to keep casting doubt on this with baseless speculation, dressed up as "theories" despite all of the evidence provided and no evidence for these "theories" even though I continually ask you to provide some. The burden is on you to either prove a deficit in this evidence or to move on from it. --- BasileosPetros, KhanofKhans, CokeZero, and many more</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1