LogFAQs > #878261168

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How do you refute the historical evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus
DawkinsNumber4 05/01/17 12:19:16 PM #155:	Saloonist posted... DawkinsNumber4 posted... Saloonist posted... If you are going to continue peddling in sensationalism and fabulous theories I suggest you provide some evidence. Wow, really? Linking to a Sikh website, a Muslim book, and a documentary is not evidence. They have nothing to add to the discussion based on the merits of the historical sources that we have besides rampant speculation. There is no evidence that Jesus survived the crucifixion, but many sources of evidence that he died under Pontius Pilate. And there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of Paul or the historical narratives of the Gospels. They are consistent with what we know about crucifixion during that time period, and are reinforced by the later non-Christian sources that confirm the crucifixion. I am not trying to provide evidence of anything other than the fact alternative theories exist that are just as possible as your theories and just as verifiable. Do you deny if in fact the Roman became a Christian bishop then that would give him a motive to have botched the crucifixion intentionally ? Do you really think things were so perfect where such events or interactions didn't take place? This was what during the time of Caesar? --- https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board <cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted [p:878261168] in How do you... [t:75297940]...</cite> <quote><cite>Saloonist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Saloonist posted...</cite> <quote>If you are going to continue peddling in sensationalism and fabulous theories I suggest you provide some evidence.</quote> Wow, really?</quote> Linking to a Sikh website, a Muslim book, and a documentary is not evidence. They have nothing to add to the discussion based on the merits of the historical sources that we have besides rampant speculation. There is no evidence that Jesus survived the crucifixion, but many sources of evidence that he died under Pontius Pilate. And there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of Paul or the historical narratives of the Gospels. They are consistent with what we know about crucifixion during that time period, and are reinforced by the later non-Christian sources that confirm the crucifixion.</quote> I am not trying to provide evidence of anything other than the fact alternative theories exist that are just as possible as your theories and just as verifiable. Do you deny if in fact the Roman became a Christian bishop then that would give him a motive to have botched the crucifixion intentionally ? Do you really think things were so perfect where such events or interactions didn't take place? This was what during the time of Caesar? --- https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1