LogFAQs > #878163414

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
TheDarkCircle 04/29/17 8:05:14 PM #44:	FlashOfLight posted... So what do you guys think? Was does this fight overall good to give boxing a decent name again with a top quality match? Unfortunately the problem is the PPV model for the most premiere fights. This was an incredible fight, but there's no chance I would have paid for it beforehand if it were a PPV. People have been burned too many times by buying PPVs and watching dull fights, or promoters cherry picking subpar opponents for their cashcow fighters and it's completely destroyed the fanbase for the sport, and prevented people who might be interested in watching boxing for the first time from getting into it. This was the best fight I've seen in years, but unfortunately I don't think anything can save the sport till the model changes, which it never will. <cite>TheDarkCircle posted [p:878163414] in Wladimir K... [t:75293352]...</cite> <quote><cite>FlashOfLight posted...</cite> <quote>So what do you guys think? Was does this fight overall good to give boxing a decent name again with a top quality match?</quote> Unfortunately the problem is the PPV model for the most premiere fights. This was an incredible fight, but there's no chance I would have paid for it beforehand if it were a PPV. People have been burned too many times by buying PPVs and watching dull fights, or promoters cherry picking subpar opponents for their cashcow fighters and it's completely destroyed the fanbase for the sport, and prevented people who might be interested in watching boxing for the first time from getting into it. This was the best fight I've seen in years, but unfortunately I don't think anything can save the sport till the model changes, which it never will.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1