LogFAQs > #878077692

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDr. David Dao reaches settlement with United Airlines
UnfairRepresent
04/28/17 12:09:17 PM
#42:


Theshamen posted...


He literally mentions force majeure as the reason they would use, but dismisses it because at the time they hadn't cited a reason for it.

The quote is from yesterday.

They never cited a reason for it. They admitted fault, settled .

And those are not force majuere reasons. That wouldn't hold up in court.



Force majeure is generally intended to include occurrences beyond the reasonable control of a party, and therefore would not cover:

Any result of the negligence or malfeasance of a party, which has a materially adverse effect on the ability of such party to perform its obligations.

You're better off sticking with "He was disorderly" or "He endangered the staff/flight"


"We fucked up and let you board and now need to throw 4 staffers on" is negligence
---
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1