LogFAQs > #877982247

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So why are transgenders unnatural?
SKARDAVNELNATE 04/27/17 12:25:20 AM #79:	yutterh posted... the animal kingdom itself has quite a few different animals that can change sex Humans aren't one of them. yutterh posted... No other species uses transportation vehicles or uses computer's. If you look at humans our ability to adapt and change and create is part of our nature as beings. None of those things are natural either. Humans making things is natural for human, not for the things that are made. By definition those things are "man made". They do not exist in nature without human intervention. The thing with changing sex in humans is that it takes a natural process and alters it. It is therefor not of nature, thus unnatural. Foppe posted... ...but we got homosexuality in nature, how is that not normal? It's not normal because it not the statistical norm. Norms and Nature are separate matters. One doesn't have much bearing on the other. CountessRolab posted... By your definition, blonde hair is not normal because it isnt the majority. That is technically correct. Blonde hair is natural, though it is a statistical outlier. This reinforces my point about Norms and Nature being separate matters. IronBornCorps posted... Not all transgender people go through these various procedures though, and cis people get plastic surgery as well. There is a distinction between self-identifying as a gender that is different from ones biology and altering ones body to approximate the gender one self-identifies as. The first post makes it about the alteration. That there are other species capable of changing sex is a biological fact. Whether those species self-identify as one or the other is unknown. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:877982247] in So why are... [t:75279815]...</cite> <quote><cite>yutterh posted...</cite> <quote>the animal kingdom itself has quite a few different animals that can change sex</quote> Humans aren't one of them. <cite>yutterh posted...</cite> <quote>No other species uses transportation vehicles or uses computer's. If you look at humans our ability to adapt and change and create is part of our nature as beings.</quote> None of those things are natural either. Humans making things is natural for human, not for the things that are made. By definition those things are "man made". They do not exist in nature without human intervention. The thing with changing sex in humans is that it takes a natural process and alters it. It is therefor not of nature, thus unnatural. <cite>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>...but we got homosexuality in nature, how is that not normal?</quote> It's not normal because it not the statistical norm. Norms and Nature are separate matters. One doesn't have much bearing on the other. <cite>CountessRolab posted...</cite> <quote>By your definition, blonde hair is not normal because it isnt the majority.</quote> That is technically correct. Blonde hair is natural, though it is a statistical outlier. This reinforces my point about Norms and Nature being separate matters. <cite>IronBornCorps posted...</cite> <quote>Not all transgender people go through these various procedures though, and cis people get plastic surgery as well.</quote> There is a distinction between self-identifying as a gender that is different from ones biology and altering ones body to approximate the gender one self-identifies as. The first post makes it about the alteration. That there are other species capable of changing sex is a biological fact. Whether those species self-identify as one or the other is unknown. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1