LogFAQs > #877572209

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJedi vs Saiyan vs Avatar
Kim Kusanagi
04/20/17 2:50:43 PM
#64:


YookaLaylee posted...
FrenchCrunch posted...
YookaLaylee posted...
Jedis are pretty weak. If you look back at the original trilogy, you'll see that they don't have a lot of cool feats. Other than dearth Vader force choking people, they don't really do anything besides the Jedi mind trick and using light sabers. And the Jedi mind trick only works on weak willed people. The avatar is much more powerful in comparison. He can strike you with lightning, burn you, throw boulders at you, slice you to death with air and hurricanes, control metal, create tsunamis or remove all of the water in your body. Plus the avatar gets reincarnated over and over again so you're essentially immortal. It's way better than being a Jedi.

okay and then we have the prequels and sequel that show they can do things like use super speed, predict the future, hold blaster fire, toss giant objects, and much more

they'll be faster than an avatar and precognitive

DarkChozoGhost posted...
FrenchCrunch posted...
the average saiyans were weaker than raditz, he was an elite

This is flat out wrong. Raditz is characteristically NOT an elite.

raditz was the same rank as nappa

The prequels aren't canon for me.


You don't get to decide the canon sorry.
---
Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting.
Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1