That's perfectly fine. A group of people that want to share what they have is fantastic. It's when you start taking shit away from people to give to others that people have a problem.
The man that spends 14 hours a day hanging cable and working by the sweat of his brow is entitled to more than the boy that spends 14 hours a day playing Nintendo and looking at anime porn.
This is the biggest issue with Neocon logic. It requires antagonizing and strawmen to exist. How many times have people made the "X hard worker has his money stolen while lowlife benefits!" argument? It's not even an argument. It's bordering on a false dichotomy, using emotional ploys to make yourself look just.
You'd think after arguing on message boards for years you might have analyzed some of the dumpster fire rhetoric you throw around, but I guess not. It's all based in the "Fuck you I've got mine" set of thinking and will create a villain in order to justify the mentality's existence.
It's not even a matter of whether or not wealth redistribution is the correct avenue, honestly. Your post is just bad. It's a mess. It's illogical. It's poorly thought out. It contributes nothing.
It's no different than liberals that throw emotional ploys on immigration. You have no ideological high ground on your opponents and no reason for more independent people (like me) to take you seriously. If you want economic conservatism is work, you're going to need to present real arguments for why it works using statistics and numbers and countries that have used ideas effectively, not garbage strawman arguments.