LogFAQs > #877293182

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	this is literally how liberals think the world should work
MaverickXeo 04/16/17 6:45:17 AM #80:	bretonftw posted... MaverickXeo posted... Unions only protect the lowest class of workers; the lazy and unqualified. This is just a horrible ending to that post. You know how much the working class man (that the right loves to idolize when it suits them) was fucked over before unions were a thing? How there's even still cases like with coal miners being fucked over by their companies letting them get lung diseases? No, unions protect the most easily exploitable workers. Before there were laws in place, that was true. Now, there is simply no need for unions. Ive worked at plenty of union and non-union jobs, and the real difference was the lack of work ethic in union workplaces, and the increased work ethic in jobs where there were no unions. --- --- MaverickXeo --- <cite>MaverickXeo posted [p:877293182] in this is li... [t:75242231]...</cite> <quote><cite>bretonftw posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote> Unions only protect the lowest class of workers; the lazy and unqualified.</quote> This is just a horrible ending to that post. You know how much the working class man (that the right loves to idolize when it suits them) was fucked over before unions were a thing? How there's even still cases like with coal miners being fucked over by their companies letting them get lung diseases? No, unions protect the most easily exploitable workers.</quote> Before there were laws in place, that was true. Now, there is simply no need for unions. Ive worked at plenty of union and non-union jobs, and the real difference was the lack of work ethic in union workplaces, and the increased work ethic in jobs where there were no unions. --- --- MaverickXeo ---</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1